Seattle Public Schools (SPS), filed earlier this week a U.S. District Court complaint against multiple social media firms, alleging that these platforms cause harm to students’ emotional and social health. These firms include TikTok and Meta-owned Instagram and Facebook, Snapchat and YouTube.

Kent School District, a neighboring district, joined the 91 page complaint. It claims that social media companies created a public nuisance targeting children with their products. According to the complaint, social media has been blamed for various behavioral disorders such as anxiety, depression, cyberbullying, and disordered eating. Additionally, it was suggested that students are more distracted from their educations by these companies.

The goal of social media is not to be eliminated, but rather to make these businesses more accountable and change the way they operate. SPS revealed that we are asking the companies in question to put their best efforts into protecting students.

“Young people in the country are experiencing anxiety, depression and thoughts of suicide. SPS added that this mental health crisis affects the SPS’s mission to educate students and drains resources from schools.

TikTok refused to respond to the lawsuit. However, TikTok spokespersons stated that they prioritize safety and wellbeing of teenagers through screentime management and age restrictions.

Other social media platforms did not reply to our request for comment.

Kids And Social Media

While this lawsuit is not the first for a social-media company, it’s unclear if they can do more than make headlines.

“For a school district to file a suit against major companies blaming the mental issues of students looks past the overarching problem – namely where do parents fall in regarding their responsibility. Jason Mollica (professorial lecturer at American University) said that this is an important question. Parents should monitor what their children are doing online.

This isn’t to say that the problem doesn’t exist, and Mollica noted that there have been plenty of studies that show that too much social media exposure isn’t good for younger users – it can impact self-esteem and body image, and be a conduit for cyberbullying.

Mollica added that she knows Facebook and Twitter aren’t the most effective places to reinforce positive behavior.

A lawsuit, however, is unlikely to go very far.

Section 230 of Title 47 of the United States Code (47 USC § 230), part of the 1996 Communications Decency Act, essentially provides a legal shield for Internet companies noted Dr. Clifford Lampe, professor of information and associate dean for academic affairs at the School of Information at the University of Michigan.

He said that it was unrealistic to expect social media companies to act in the best interests of users.

Platforms are built to sell attention and don’t consider health and well-being. Lampe stated that they want us to be engaged so they can provide the same care to our flock as a shepherd would.

Companies are accused of using “Dark Patterns” to engage users …read more

Source:: Social Media Explorer

Author: Aaron