The Largest Digital Marketing Community Worldwide | Become a Member

    2. /
    3. International Association of Digital...
    4. /
    5. ‘People are only just...

‘People are only just starting to get their sh*t together’: Confessions of an in-house marketer on first-party data | International Association of Digital Marketing Professionals (IADMP)

‘People are only just starting to get their sh*t together’: Confessions of an in-house marketer on first-party data

Aaron October 11, 2022

By Ronan Shields

First-party data will restore the audience-targeting capabilities of marketing teams that have grown reliant on third-party cookies to execute online ad campaigns — that’s the theory at least.

However, as evidenced by successive delays in the sunsetting of third-party cookies from the Google Chrome team, the reality is that such a task is much easier said than done. As a result, many are adopting pragmatic tactics in order to avoid an all-out disaster come 2024 with the rise of second-party data as an offshoot.

In the latest edition of our Confessions series, in which we trade anonymity for candor, we hear from a senior marketer at a multinational gaming brand on some of the practices they have seen on how to deal with the digital media industry’s most disruptive transition.

This conversation has been lightly edited and condensed for clarity.

In public at least, everyone talks about the first-party data at their disposal, what are you seeing out there?

I saw the latest IAB trends report showing how first-party data was a top priority among advertisers in 2021 when it comes to audience targeting, but I think there may have been a misinterpretation because you’ve got the impact of GDPR… people are only just starting to get their sh*t together.

From what I see, there’s a lot of marketers, depending on their business vertical, that are only just starting to get to grips with data collection from a CRM perspective, and some haven’t even hired DPOs or data privacy officers [despite such roles now mandated under GDPR]. So, from what I see, there’s a lot of them that are prioritizing first-party data in terms of building it — they’re some way off enabling it.

So, what kind of companies do you think actually have first-party data at scale?

I wouldn’t be surprised if privacy advocates started coming after the use of second-party data.

Think of the likes of P&G [Procter & Gamble] and Unilever, I don’t think they have much first-party data, because very few people engage with them online and most people are buying their stuff through retailers, not [directly] online.

The process of figuring out whether or not you’ve got the consent to use first-party data is much more than a couple of months, you’re looking at two years of investment in infrastructure change, I think a lot of companies would have costed that up, and then think, ‘That’s too much.’

The recent IAB Europe report showed how first-party data is behind second-party data in terms of priority, and that feels about right as I think you see out there that marketers A). realize they don’t have much first-party data, or B). if they do have it, they’re not set up appropriately to enable it.

As noted, many are turning to second-party data, but does that also have concerns?

In my book, second-party data is more complex. Y’know, with first-party data, as long as …read more

Source:: Digiday

      

Aaron
Author: Aaron

Categories: International Association of Digital Marketing Professionals

Related Articles